Originating from the lily family (Lilacea), tulips overall are composed of 109 species of plant. Although naturally indigenous to mountainous areas with long, cool springs and naturally dry summers, they have subsequently been introduced as annuals in every continent on the globe.
Unfortunately, these are not the tulips we are going to speak of today. Instead, we are going to talk about a Tulip that has done more to impede the flow of life in the Body of Christ than just about anything I can think of. During the wealthiest days of the Ottoman Empire (1299 to 1923) the tulip became a symbol of abundant indulgence. And so much so that the high point of the Ottoman Era was referred to as the Tulip Era.
Isn't it ironic that so much of the church in America today has become just that,... abundantly indulgent in in it's own self-will? And much of that indulgence in American Institutionalized Christianity (AIC) has been driven by none other than TULIP doctrine. TULIP is an acronym that represents the fundamental doctrinal tenants of what we know today to be Calvinism. Many people believe that the 5 basic tenants of Calvinism where formally drawn up at the Synod of Dort in Dordrecht, Holland in 1619. Are you bored yet?
When I started writing this post about a week ago I, like everyone else, assumed that the conclusions of the Synod of Dort, the formation of TULIP and its accreditation being given to John Calvin was true. After all, the Presbyterians are the largest formal advocates of Calvinism and from what I understand they believe that John Calvin authored the basic tenants of Calvinism (TULIP). I thought that to. A devout Presbyterian gave me a book on the subject stating as much in 1996. But now I am not so sure that is the case.
Who was John Calvin, what is Calvinism, and was Calvin a Calvinist? Or was Calvinism unfairly ascribed to his name roughly 60 years after he died? And what does Calvinism have to do with you and me and the body of Christ as a whole today? How does all of this apply to our lives today? Let's answer some of these questions.
John Calvin |
But while researching this out one of the things I came to understand was that certain parts of the Protestant Reformation (PR), specifically some of the heart motives of it's leaders along with some of the doctrinal outworkings of the movement in various parts of Europe were huge mistakes. Let me explain. Out of the Protestant Reformation came what we know today as Protestantism . Protestantism ultimately branched out into two groups: The Magisterial Reformation and the Radical Reformation. Look at the following chart...
The Magisterial Reformation (MR) had three branches: Anglicans, Lutherans, and Calvinist Reformists. The Anglicans emerged in England, the Lutherans in Germany and Scandinavia while the Calvinists primarily took root in Switzerland, France and later in Scotland. The one thing that all three branches of the MR had in common was just that.....they had the backings of the magistrates, i.e. secular authorities. This meant that at times these three branches of MR Protestantism would turn to local kings, princes, city councils and magistrates to enforce their religious will and agenda. The Roman Catholic church was already doing this in countries in Southern Europe. The men who were spearheading the reformation in these three branches of the MR were walking in the same footsteps as their Roman Catholic predecessors, albeit on various levels. And from what I can tell, based on my research, John Calvin at times took it to the extreme. For further reading on MR click here.
Just so you know, I am not against God having root in government institutions. I am for that and believe that at one time much of the actions of America's founders were expressed through faith in the formation and functioning of our government institutions on all levels. I don't believe in the separation of church and state except where the state is by majority and through practice inevitably corrupt. In that respect we need to "...touch no unclean thing" so that we are received by the Lord. In that case we need to "...come out from the state and be separate" (2 Corinthians 6).
But what these men were willing to do and ultimately did in many instances was different. The men who spearheaded and maintained the three branches of MR were, according to some historical records, having dissidents murdered, burned at the stake, imprisoned and punished when it was politically expedient. Sometimes their victims were women and children, not just men. They were allowing secular authorities to institute physical, mental and emotional torture and/or death among the citizenry and also in the church in order to squelch anything they deemed as heresy. These were horrible practices when it comes to matters of church discipline and doctrine.
As an example of this, John Calvin supported the findings of the Protestant Geneva Council in Switzerland when they decided that Michael Servetus, a Spanish theologian and physician, be put to death for his views on the Non-Trinitarianism and non-Infant Baptism. While I disagree with Servetus on his views of the Trinity, scriptures make it clear you don't kill people that disagree with your understanding of scripture.
"And the Lord's servant must not quarrel; instead he must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful. Those who oppose him he must gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth, and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will." 2 Timothy 2:24-26The scriptures are clear on how to handle open practices of carnality, divisiveness amongst brethren, unruly children and people who are false teachers.
"When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, hand this man over to Satan, so that the sinful nature may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord." 1 Corinthians 5:4,5
"Warn a divisive person once, and then warn him a second time. After that have nothing to do with him." Titus 3:10
"Blows and wounds cleanse away evil and beatings purge the inmost being." Proverbs 20:30
"As I urged you when I went into Macedonia, stay there in Ephesus so that you may command certain men not to teach false doctrines any longer..." 1 Timothy 1:3You hand the rebellious and unrepentant over to the Enemy. You put out of the church those that don't respond to repeated warnings of divisiveness. You spank your kids. You command others not to teach falsely when operating in a position of authority. But you don't burn people at the stake or enlist the help of government agencies to push your doctrinal positions, at least not in the manner that John Calvin did. Calvin openly endorsed the execution of Servetus. Historical records seem to support this.
Now at this point I thought it was going to be a slam dunk to tie in some of Calvin's actions with the TULIP doctrine and all of it's deficiencies. When I researched all of this out I was assuming this was an easy conclusion. After all, doctrines and heart motives are clearly tied together. Scriptures are clear on it.
"Watch your life and doctrines closely. Persevere in them, because if you do, you will save both yourself and your hearers as well." 1 Timothy 4:16
"If any man will do his (God's) will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself." John 7:17I quickly came to the conclusion that because Calvin was involved with some of the things previously mentioned that it would be easy to tie it into the TULIP Calvinism that is ascribed to his name. But then I read this (Click Here). Dr. Richard Muller, Professor of Historical Theology at Calvin Theological Seminary states that Calvin never directly or openly advocated two of the five points of TULIP.
Therefore the point of this post will not be to try and track down the source of TULIP. It's irrelevant at this point. God will judge the source. The point is to evaluate TULIP which has become foundational doctrine in many churches today. Some say TULIP came from John Calvin. Some say it came from the Synod at Dort as influenced by Calvin's ministry. And some are claiming that TULIP was created after Dort. I don't want to take the time to find out.
So at this point I am going to break off from focusing directly on John Calvin and the Synod of Dort. We are going to focus on the TULIP itself because, regardless of the source, it does exist and is taught in every Presbyterian church on earth, many Baptist churches, non-denominational Bible Churches, and even indirectly from the pulpit in many Charismatic churches.... whether many of the Charismatics and Independent Bible Churches recognize it or not.
TULIP stands for the following:
Total Depravity
Unconditional Election
Limited Atonement
Irresistible Grace
Perseverance of the Saints
Broken down a little further into layman's terms, this is what Calvinism teaches. Click Here and Here to read it for yourself.
Total Depravity - Man is totally sinful apart from God. Man's heart is evil and he is a slave to sin. (Agree)
Unconditional Election - God chooses some people to be saved and others to not be saved, not based on anything he sees in them, but solely based on his Sovereignty which is unexplainable. (Do not Agree)
Limited Atonement - Jesus died only for the elect. (???)
Irresistible Grace - When God saves a man there is nothing the man can do to reject salvation. You can't resist the Holy Spirit. He saves you and there is nothing you can do to reject God's election. He has saved you whether you like it or not. (Click Here for my response to that one. )
Perseverance of the Saints - You can't lose your salvation. Once Saved, Always Saved. Same as Irresistible Grace. (Sin Away Saints!!!!)
OK. As I stated from the beginning, the Tulip Era in the Ottoman Empire was symbolized by indulgence. In the next post or two I am going to show how adherence to TULIP in 4 of it's 5 facets promotes arrogance, undermines the Fear of the Lord, drowns out the voice of God, makes believers unproductive in the Work of God and gives some believers a false sense of security about what it really means to be saved. Like the Tulip Era of the Ottomans, I am going to show you how 80% of TULIP doctrine makes people indulgent in their own self-will and self-desires. Stay Tuned!!!
Blessings,
JEB
http://www.miraclesinmerida.blogspot.com/.